Sign in or 

tolsen |
Latest page update: made by tolsen
, Oct 17 2008, 9:47 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by tolsen
124 words added view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
public_writing
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cnicolas | Defining public writing | 0 | Oct 17 2008, 10:01 AM EDT by cnicolas | ||
|
Thread started: Oct 17 2008, 10:01 AM EDT
Watch
We have wrestled with definitions of public writing. What are the differences between public writing, academic writing, professional writing? How do you define "public" in public writing?
Do you find this valuable?
Keyword tags:
academic writing
professional writing
public writing
|
|||||
| tolsen | Weisser | 2 | Oct 16 2008, 12:14 AM EDT by tolsen | ||
|
Thread started: Oct 15 2008, 8:31 AM EDT
Watch
I just finished reading a chapter from Weiser's 2002 book, Moving Beyond Academic Discourse: Composition Studies and the Public Sphere. He's very interesting and makes some interesting points about the old model of "public writing"--sending in a letter to the editor. I particularly liked this passage:
There is one final assumption about public writing that I would like to address: that its only purpose is to sway public opinion and that it does not encompass actual decision making and action. Some instructors of public writing who employ newspapers as their primary avenue for such assignments seem to feel that students’ public writing can rarely lead to substantial changes in public policy and can at best only convince others to “think differently.” ... This presumption is especially pernicious because it foreclosesreal results from student writing and often turns public writing assignments into pointless and futile exercises. While I’m not suggesting that public writing must always lead to decision making, I do believe that in certain circumstances it can...[P]ublic writing can form opinions and translate them into authoritative decisions, but only if we reconsider the presumption that public discourse is necessarily separated from legislative action. Students’ public writing can have significant, tangible, immediate results if it is directed toward publics where both debate and decision making are central goals. As facilitators of public writing, it is important that we help students locate strong publics where their voices can lead to action. Asking students to write in spheres discourse does not often lead to direct action, such as the local newspaper, is often pointless and futile. There are many arenas where student discourse can lead to palpable changes for them and others, and students may very well be members of these publics already. (110-111) |
|||||
| cnicolas | Ethics and digital writing | 1 | Oct 15 2008, 8:22 AM EDT by tolsen | ||
|
Thread started: Sep 29 2008, 3:38 PM EDT
Watch
Here is an interesting source to consider as we do research on students' writing in web 2.0
McKee, H. &. Porter, J. (2008). The ethics of digital writing research: A rhetorical approach. College Composition and Communication , 59 (4), 711-749. This essay deals with the ethical dimensions of doing research on web-based writing, and argues that current federal, organizational and institutional guidelines are ill-suited for this type of emerging research. It proposes that a model grounded in rhetoric and casuistry would better meet the unique needs of research about digital writing. Although this essay is geared towards researchers, those of us considering using digital writing in our courses can infer important questions from it: How is digital writing blending the boundaries between public and private space? How "public" do digital writers understand their writing to be? How does one deal with students' disclosure of their personal informal (and that of their acquaintances) on the internet?
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
Keyword tags:
digital writing
|
|||||