Sign in or 

tolsen |
Latest page update: made by tolsen
, Oct 16 2008, 11:45 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by tolsen
156 words added 61 words deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tolsen | what would you ad? | 0 | Oct 17 2008, 2:42 PM EDT by tolsen | ||
|
Thread started: Oct 17 2008, 2:42 PM EDT
Watch
What else should students do and be graded on? A student profile?
|
|||||
| tolsen | Previous rubric | 0 | Oct 16 2008, 11:35 PM EDT by tolsen | ||
|
Thread started: Oct 16 2008, 11:35 PM EDT
Watch
I tried to use a more traditional rubric (and it did not work):
Criteria ______page length, 8-10 pages ______3 drafts ______Works Cited page in MLA style ______One authoritative web site at least ______One image (photo or graph or chart) at least ______One print source _____ uses a clear approach and follows guidelines of that approach: Investigative Position Paper Definition Policy Refutation ______ clear argument; central thesis _______Thoughtfulness of your argument _______Accuracy (citations, quotations, statement of ideas) _______Inclusion of all important information to support the argument _______meets criteria of the writing rubric _______ sources: aim for 10. You have two types: primary and secondary. As for secondary: majority should be critical / authoritative. Show a variety. |
|||||