|
Oct 17 2008, 9:34 AM EDT
|
tolsen
|
|
edit |
71 words added
79 words deleted
|
|
Change: What learning outcomes will I need to add to the course in order to incorporate the web assignment? What criteria will I use to grade the assignment? Institutional/departmental expectations and requirements questions How much can I depart from more traditional genres of writing and still meet departmental/institutional expectations? Genre
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 551)
|
|
Oct 17 2008, 9:32 AM EDT
|
tolsen
|
|
edit |
1 word added
2 words deleted
|
|
Change: assignments. ,assignments as well as how we conceptualize the course. Below are some questions to consider before getting started.For some guidelines, I first turn to McKee and Edwards and their article " The
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 558)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 11:28 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
2 words added
4 words deleted
|
|
Change: Edwards (see below)Edwards(2005) and their discussion of students' "insider knowledge" which they define as "knowledge about how discourse works on the world Wide Web" (p. 206). This knowledge, McKee and Edwards argue, shapes how students conceptualize/ write their web pages.Technical questions How comfortable am
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 558)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 11:25 PM EDT
|
tolsen
|
|
edit |
4 words added
4 words deleted
|
|
Change: " We"We should acknowledge students' expertise in understanding, navigating, and composing in Web genres while also sharing our own expertise in analyzing and understanding genres..."
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 559)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 11:23 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
1 word added
4 words deleted
|
|
Change: "2. We"We should cultivate an awareness of and receptivity to hybrid, changing genres both in ourselves and in our students..." ( p. 214) 3. We should foster awareness of the multiple, overlapping influences on the composition of web texts" (p. 215). For those who are
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 559)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 10:37 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
161 words deleted
|
|
Change: " 1. We should acknowledge students' expertise in understanding, navigating, and composing in Web genres while also sharing our own expertise in analyzing and understanding
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 562)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 10:31 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
366 words added
177 words deleted
|
|
Change: " 1. We should acknowledge students' expertise in understanding, navigating, and composing in Web genres while also sharing our own expertise in analyzing and understanding genres..." ( p. 213). (They explain that students' "insider knowledge" often contrasts with the instructor's "insider knowledge,". They found that students' interests?web pages
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 721)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 9:20 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
1 word added
3 words deleted
|
|
Change: before you start:starting: Why are you choosing the web as a site for the public writing assignment in your course? Is your choice driven by personal interest? organizational, institutional or departmental goals? students' interests? The following questions may help you refine your
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 532)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 9:19 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
16 words added
16 words deleted
|
|
Change: How much can you depart from more traditional genres of writing and still satisfy departmental/institutional guidelines? For some guidelines, I turn here to McKee and Edwards and their article " The teaching and
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 534)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 9:16 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
32 words added
23 words deleted
|
|
Change: And then, there are theTechnical more mundane questions:questions How comfortable are you helping students with the technical aspects of writing for the web? How much technical knowledge will students have to master in order to complete the assignment? How and when will they get that knowledge? Course
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 534)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 8:43 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
6 words deleted
|
|
Change: (best practices--summarize from mckee??) annotated sources)taimi--what I use and critique; use of est. criteria, possible additions. grading online. what extra stuff we teach. graphic organization, visual analysis, what they can use. )ResourcesEdwards, M. & McKee, H. (2005). The teaching
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 525)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 8:41 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
35 words added
29 words deleted
|
|
Change: Edwards, M. & McKee, H. (2005). The teaching and learning of web genres in first-year composition. In A. Herrington & C. Moran (Eds.) Genre across the curriculum (pp. 196-218). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Here is an online list of various evaluation
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 532)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 8:36 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
88 words added
39 words deleted
|
|
Change: For more on this topic, turn to McKee and Edwards (see below) and their discussion of students' "insider knowledge" which they define as "knowledge about how discourse works on the world Wide Web" (p. 206). This knowledge, McKee and Edwards argue, shapes how students conceptualize/ write their web pages. And
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 527)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 8:28 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
115 words added
17 words deleted
|
|
Change: genres..." ( p. 213). Especially insightful was their description of students' "insider knowledge," which shapes how they conceptualize/ write their web pages. This knowledge often
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 478)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 8:15 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
106 words added
1 word deleted
|
|
Change: " 1. We should acknowledge students' expertise in understanding, navigating, and composing in Web genres while also sharing our own expertise in analyzing and understanding genres...2. We should cultivate an awareness of and receptivity to hybrid, changing genres both in ourselves and in our students... 3. We
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 379)
|
|
Oct 16 2008, 7:39 PM EDT
|
cnicolas
|
|
edit |
206 words added
|
|
Change: Why are you choosing the web as a site for the public writing assignment in your course? Is your choice driven by personal interest? organizational, institutional or departmental goals? students' interests? Whatever drives your choice again will determine the assumptions you should consider in your design. What genre
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 276)
|
|
Oct 9 2008, 1:50 PM EDT
|
tolsen
|
|
edit |
27 words added
|
|
Change: taimi--what I use and critique; use of est. criteria, possible additions. grading online. what extra stuff we teach. graphic organization, visual analysis, what they can use. )ResourcesHere is an online list of various evaluation standards for writing
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 69)
|
|
Oct 9 2008, 1:42 PM EDT
|
tolsen
|
|
edit |
2 words added
|
|
Change: (best practices--summarize from mckee??) annotated sources)ResourcesHere is an online list of various evaluation standards for writing and digital writing (including the NCTE writing standards and the ALA information literacy standards: http://digitalwriting.pbwiki.com/Standards+related+to+digital+writing
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 42)
|
|
Oct 9 2008, 1:41 PM EDT
|
tolsen
|
|
edit |
4 words added
|
|
Change: (best practices--summarize from mckee??)ResourcesHere is an online list of various evaluation standards for writing and digital writing (including the NCTE writing standards and the ALA information literacy standards: http://digitalwriting.pbwiki.com/Standards+related+to+digital+writing
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 40)
|
|
Oct 8 2008, 4:59 PM EDT
|
tolsen
|
|
edit |
27 words added
|
|
Change: ResourcesHere is an online list of various evaluation standards for writing and digital writing (including the NCTE writing standards and the ALA information literacy standards: http://digitalwriting.pbwiki.com/Standards+related+to+digital+writing
View changes from previous version.
(Word count: 35)
|